Resolver vs encoder?


Dear colleagues, hello

Educational Simulation (DERELL)

Topic: Resolver vs Encoder — devices for measuring a shaft’s angular position. Resolver outputs continuous analog sin/cos signals; Encoder outputs discrete digital quadrature A/B pulses.

Angle (deg)
Speed (deg/s)
Use negative for reverse
Noise (Resolver)
Adds small analog noise to sin/cos
Resolver (Analog sin/cos)
sin=0.006   cos=0.990
Rotor Angle
Analog Waveforms
sin(θ) cos(θ)

Key idea: A resolver senses angle as continuous analog sin and cos amplitudes. Small angle changes produce smooth voltage changes, ideal for harsh environments.

Encoder (Digital A/B)
PPR
Quantized Steps
Quadrature Channels
A B
State: A=1, B=1   Direction: Forward   Step Index: 0

Key idea: An encoder reports angle as discrete steps using digital A/B pulses. Direction is read from the phase lead; higher PPR gives finer resolution.

Both resolvers and encoders are devices used to measure the angular position of a rotating shaft, but they have different operating principles, advantages, and disadvantages. Here's a comparison of the two:

 Operating principle:
        Resolvers: They are analog electromechanical devices that use a rotary transformer to convert angular position into an analog electrical signal.
        Encoders: They are digital devices (optical, magnetic, or capacitive) that convert angular position into a digital signal.

 Resolution and accuracy:
        Resolvers: They typically have lower resolution and accuracy compared to encoders.
        Encoders: They can offer high resolution and accuracy, depending on the type and quality of the encoder.

 Signal processing:
        Resolvers: They require more complex signal processing, as their output is an analog signal.
        Encoders: They provide digital output signals, which are usually easier to process and interface with control systems.

 Environmental tolerance:
        Resolvers: They are generally more robust and can tolerate harsh environments, high temperatures, and electromagnetic interference.
        Encoders: They can be more sensitive to environmental factors, such as dust, moisture, and electromagnetic interference, depending on the type and construction.

 Longevity and maintenance:
        Resolvers: They are less prone to mechanical wear and tear, making them suitable for long-term and low-maintenance applications.
        Encoders: They can be more susceptible to mechanical wear, especially in the case of optical encoders with moving parts.

 Cost:
        Resolvers: They can be more expensive due to their construction and materials, but this may be offset by their durability and longevity.
        Encoders: They can be less expensive, especially in the case of incremental encoders, but their lifespan might be shorter in harsh environments.

++ What is resolver?

++ What is encoder?


The choice between a resolver and an encoder depends on the specific requirements of the application, such as resolution, accuracy, environmental conditions, and cost. Resolvers are a better choice for applications that require high reliability and robustness in harsh environments, while encoders are more suitable for applications that require high resolution, accuracy, and easier signal processing.


+ Back to Encoders Main page

+ Encoder Output types

+ Encoder Controller

+ Plc System for encoder

+ Encoder prices

+ Servo Systems

+ VFD main page -


Your shopping cart is empty!